On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Ben Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, Bram, > > Another oddity I've recently discovered is that str2nr won't accept an > explicitly > positive number, such as '+3'. > > This is unexpected. Would you be willing to adjust the behaviour? I can't > think of > any negative/compatibility-breaking side effects this would have, but I > also don't > know where the vim_str2nr function is used. C functions atoi() and strtol() both do accept + in front of the number, if it matters. Yakov --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
