Gary Johnson wrote: > On 2008-06-24, Ben Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Bram Moolenaar wrote: >>> Chris Sutcliffe wrote: >>>> There is a small issue with this patch: >>>> >>>>> *** ../vim-7.1.327/src/os_unix.c Fri Jun 20 11:58:27 2008 >>>>> --- src/os_unix.c Sat Jun 21 13:06:45 2008 >>>>> *************** >>>>> *** 2278,2283 **** >>>>> --- 2278,2287 ---- >>>>> char_u olddir[MAXPATHL]; >>>>> char_u *p; >>>>> int retval = OK; >>>>> + #ifdef __CYGWIN__ >>>>> + char_u posix_fname[MAX_PATH]; >>>>> + #endif >>>>> + >>>> MAX_PATH is undeclared when I attempted to compile this with Cygwin. >>>> I changed it to MAXPATHL and it works fine. >>> So Cygwin doesn't follow its own documentation? So much for trusting >>> that. >> Yeah, that's very poor form. >> >> Unless it's a Cygwin documentation vs. implementation version issue, but >> that hardly seems likely. > > What documentation are you referring to?
The one I found was http://www.cygwin.com/cygwin-api/func-cygwin-conv-to-posix-path.html Bram may have found something different. Ben. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
