Ben Schmidt, 17.12.2008: > > >>> I think we don't need the foldcolumn in HTML. One can click on the fold > >>> to open it, and on the text to close it again. That's a lot simpler and > >>> removes the not-so-nice-looking fold column. > >> How do you solve the ambiguity problem when there are two folds starting > >> on the same line without the foldcolumn though (i.e. whether a click > >> should open the second fold or close the first)? If they can appear > >> beside each other in the foldcolumn, as in the prototype, that solves > >> that problem quite nicely. I think. > > > > The same way it works for nested structures: first click opens the first > > level, second click the second level, etc. > > > > For closing you would have to click on the text of the opened fold, not > > a closed fold at the start of that fold. > > What about if there is no such text? I.e. if every line of a fold is > part of a subfold? Then you have the problem of an uncloseable fold with > this interface (unless I misunderstand).
Exactly what I have already written :) Markus --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
