On Wednesday 21 January 2009 7:04 pm, John Little wrote: > > sc wrote: > > > this will apply to a finite subset of subscribers > > I knew vim was popular, but I didn't think the list had quite so many > on it... (the qualification "finite" implies the existence of non- > finite subsets).
whatever was i thinking! i certainly never intended to imply that, unless perhaps the list has tardis-like properties? > Hm, my netrw.vim is in /usr/local/share/vim/vim72/autoload. in which case you are not in the subset for which i had so much trouble finding the proper adjective -- indeed -- based on the level of interest expressed so far, i'd say this particular subset can list me as its only member i'd guess upwards of 99% of vim users are fine with the netrw that comes with the runtime, as would i also be if i hadn't recently had to upgrade to avoid a bug that had my lonely, squeaky, uncapitalized voice as its only interested party sc --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
