On 15/07/09 14:43, mobi phil wrote:
[...]
> Look, I think I am enough mature and have years of IT, I know how to
> attack a problem. I have these ideas for years now, I wanted to be sure
> that they are useful. And now I am convinced that they are useful. What
> you say depends on what does it mean "vim way". You mean vim way of
> vim 3.7 or vim way of 10.11? There is a difference. I think you got the
> point.
> Of course I am not pretending to add a c++ compiler for the highlighting.
> That would be against the basic principle "vim is the fastest editor".
> Any feature
> that would break that basic principle is nonsense for me.
[...]
Oh, so you know better what Vim release 11 should include? Well, go
ahead, take the sources (they're there for anyone to look at) or start
from scratch, and come back 5 years from now (or somesuch - when Bram
will be releasing _his_ Vim 11.0) to put Bram's nose in his shit by
showing thim that he had it all wrong and how vim 11 REALLY should behave.
Good luck!
Tony.
--
hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict:
75. You start wondering whether you could actually upgrade your brain
with a Pentium Pro microprocessor 80. The upgrade works just fine.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
