On Jul 17, 8:56 pm, Marc Weber <[email protected]> wrote:
> Excerpts from StarWing's message of Fri Jul 17 13:11:16 +0200 2009:> haha, I
> found this for a long time. but this isn't fit me. I used
> > several month but I can't understand Haskell, and (in my opinion)
> > Haskell community is more or less unfriendly (maybe it's caused by my
> > rude :-( I don't want that, but my English is really bad )
>
> I've made different experience. But yes: Learning haskell is as hard as
> learning vim :)
>
> > I want something mixed Vi & ruby. to make a ruby-like language to fit
> > Vim, mix it into Vi's lower level implement. that's all.
>
> I'd be glad if an existing language (ruby, perl, python, ..) fits your
> needs. Because learning yet another language to script vim is bad IMHO.
>
> Marc Weber
Oh, the best way is just extend current VimL. not change it. make it a
little more flexable and mainly: fast. all other changes can
background.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
