Roland Puntaier wrote:
> I hope you can add this to the trunk: I supports now both python 3.x and
> python 2.x.
Wow, this is a big patch. Thanks for all your work.
We do need to find any problems. I won't add it until after testing.
> To have both python 3.x and python 2.x support there is only one way:
> load the symbols manually in code via dlopen(), dlsym() and dlclose()
> or LoadLibrary(), GetProcAddress(), FreeLibrary() on Windows.
That makes sense. I suppose linking with both libraries causes
conflicts.
In the source code changes I notice you now define FEAT_PYTHON3, but
there is no FEAT_PYTHON2. I would think we need both, since we can have
Vim with:
- only Python 2 (current situation)
- only Python 3 (future)
- both Python 2 and 3
How do we distinguish the second and third situation?
The rest sounds good. I hope a few people try it out and give us
feedback.
--
hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict:
263. You have more e-mail addresses than shorts.
/// Bram Moolenaar -- b...@moolenaar.net -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ download, build and distribute -- http://www.A-A-P.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
