On Oct 13, 6:56 pm, Charles E Campbell Jr <drc...@campbellfamily.biz> wrote: > Bee wrote: > > sort bug? > > > vim 7.3.27 Linux > > vim 7.3.21 Mac 10.4.11 > > > Select the lines between the rules (including the blank lines) and > > sort: > > '<,'>sort n > > > "--------1---------2---------3---------4---------5---------6---- > > xxx yyy: 0 > > xxx yyy: 1 > > xxx yyy: 2 > > xxx yyy: 3 > > xxx yyy: 4 > > > xxx yyy: 5 > > xxx yyy: 6 > > xxx yyy: 7 > > xxx yyy: 8 > > xxx yyy: 9 > > > "--------1---------2---------3---------4---------5---------6---- > > > The result is: > > > "--------1---------2---------3---------4---------5---------6---- > > xxx yyy: 0 > > > xxx yyy: 1 > > xxx yyy: 2 > > xxx yyy: 3 > > xxx yyy: 4 > > xxx yyy: 5 > > xxx yyy: 6 > > xxx yyy: 7 > > xxx yyy: 8 > > xxx yyy: 9 > > "--------1---------2---------3---------4---------5---------6---- > > > I would expect this and it is what I get when using the shell: > > '<,'>!sort -n > > > "--------1---------2---------3---------4---------5---------6---- > > > xxx yyy: 0 > > xxx yyy: 1 > > xxx yyy: 2 > > xxx yyy: 3 > > xxx yyy: 4 > > xxx yyy: 5 > > xxx yyy: 6 > > xxx yyy: 7 > > xxx yyy: 8 > > xxx yyy: 9 > > "--------1---------2---------3---------4---------5---------6---- > > I tried your example and was unable to duplicate the problem. Have you > tried putting this in a file, say sort.test: > vim -u NONE -N sort.test > :%sort > > I tried that, and I tried using V and selecting all the lines, and each > time I got the "I would expect this..." result.
Thank you, I did not think to do "vim -u NONE -N" and... I then get the expected result! That means something in my vimrc is causing the sort problem. I will remember to do that first next time. -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
