On 02/05/11 12:03, Tim Cuthbertson wrote:
Hi all,
I love vim, but must admit to not being so fond of the fairly old
looking icon. I recently created a new logo for my own use, and would
be more than happy if you'd like to use it for an actual app icon or
logo.
I'm happy to release it under pretty much whatever licence is
required, if people want to modify / improve it.
The icon can be found here:
http://gfxmonk.net/2011/04/25/new-gvim-icon.html
svg: http://gfxmonk.net/images/vim-logo/vim-logo.svg
png: http://gfxmonk.net/images/vim-logo/vim-logo-128.png
Cheers,
- Tim.
What's wrong with that old icon? Doesn't anyone use low resolutions
and/or 256-colour terminals anymore (even in the deepest of the jungles
where Vim might be in use on 4th-hand computers even if Vista isn't
supported by them)?
I have a 48x48 Vim icon on my desktop and it doesn't look out of place
next to SeaMonkey, Thunderbird, Adobe Reader and YaST.
BTW, the HTML textbooks I have here still mention "safe" GUI colours,
which are colours where the red, green and blue components are each a
multiple of 0x33 (in #rrggbb notation) or of 3 (in "abbreviated"
3-nybble #rgb notation). This means there are 6^3 = 216 "safe" colours.
Best regards,
Tony.
--
HOW YOU CAN TELL THAT IT'S GOING TO BE A ROTTEN DAY:
#15 Your pet rock snaps at you.
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
