Hi Bram! On Mo, 13 Jun 2011, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> I finally had time to look into this. Sorry for the delay. > > I think the current behavior is correct. Showing a sign only when it > happens to be on the first line of a closed fold doesn't seem right. > Why not show a sign on the second line or last line of the fold? Basically for the same reason, you show the line number of the first line in the fold. But I don't have a strong feeling for it anyway. The current behaviour is fine for me. I just took the chance, when this question came up, to look into it and give something back to the community. > Since we don't show signs for the folded region, I think it's good to > also use the closed-fold color in the sign column. I don't really mind. In my opinion, it looks a little bit odd, though. regards, Christian -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php