On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Bram Moolenaar <b...@moolenaar.net> wrote: > > Ben Fritz wrote: > >> On Monday, May 21, 2012 12:59:47 PM UTC-5, Thilo Six wrote: >> > > How about setting up an independent repo (not a clone) at >> > > http://vim-runtime.googlecode.com/ >> > > Code license: GNU GPL v2 >> > >> > runtimefiles are all (or better they all should be) licensed under Vim >> > licences. >> >> Yeah, but Google Code only has a few allowed licenses. Vim License is >> not one of them. Bram has dual-licensed Vim under GPL v2 and Vim >> License to allow putting it on Google Code. > > The dual-license wasn't created for that reason :-). > > I suppose it's OK to list the work as GPL, since it's the more > restrictive. Thus stays on the safe side. >
My mistake, I thought that was the reason, since it wasn't dual-licensed to my knowledge until the Mercurial repo. Can you enlighten us? -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
