Status: New
Owner: ----
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 94 by shlo...@gmail.com: Better support is needed for DocBook 5
in filetype.vim and filetype/docbk.vim
http://code.google.com/p/vim/issues/detail?id=94
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Try opening a DocBook/XML 5 file such as
https://bitbucket.org/shlomif/shlomi-fish-homepage/src/d3f1e09a1269d87d84d5941398bfa8c6030820af/lib/docbook/5/xml/human-hacking-field-guide-v2.xml?at=default
using "vim human*.xml" or "gvim human*.xml".
2. "set ft?" will indicate it as xml instead of as docbk.
3. After doing "set ft=docbk" some of the tags won't be highlighted.
What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
I'm using git from vim-hg on Linux.
The problem is that DocBook/XML 5 did away with the DOCTYPE and are instead
using namespaces. The attached file fixes part of the problem, but I've
delayed working out the difference in tags between DocBook 4 and DocBook 5
for later on.
I am going to work on it on this branch:
https://code.google.com/r/shlomif-changes/source/list?name=shlomif_docbook5_support
Best regards,
-- Shlomi Fish
Attachments:
docbook-5-hg.diff 473 bytes
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
