On Wednesday, January 23, 2013 2:07:27 PM UTC-6, Ben Fritz wrote: > On Wednesday, January 23, 2013 1:28:16 PM UTC-6, Dominique Pelle wrote: > > Bram Moolenaar <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Patch 7.3.782 > > > > > --- runtime/doc/options.txt 2013-01-23 18:24:48.000000000 +0100 > > > > > *************** > > > > > *** 3518,3523 **** > > > > > --- 3560,3569 ---- > > > > > to set 'guifontwide' at all unless you want to override the choice > > > > > made by Pango/Xft. > > > > > > > > > > + Windows +multibyte only: *guifontwide_win_mbyte* > > > > > + > > > > > + If set and vaild, 'guifontwide' is used for IME instead of > > > 'guifont'. > > > > > > > > > > > > There is a typo here: vaild -> valid > > > > > > > > Are you sure? Isn't this saying that 'guifontwide' is used instead of > 'guifont', if 'guifontwide' contains a non-empty valid font value?
Darnit, nevermind. Somehow I read "valid->invalid" instead of "vaild->valid" as you wrote. Ignore my previous message. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
