Yes, C11 is not C++11. It's ISO/IEC 9899: 2011. On 3/2/13, Bram Moolenaar <b...@moolenaar.net> wrote: > > Yasuhiro Matsumoto wrote: > >> > This uses the variable cpp_no_cpp11. Can we document this? >> >> https://gist.github.com/5047752 > > Thanks. > >> > There also is c_no_c11, I suppose that has a different meaning. >> >> It exists in c.vim already. >> >> Sorry I can add more in well‐chosen words... > > I mean that c_no_c11 should be a separate variable because it has a > different meaning thatn cpp_no_cpp11, right? > > -- > hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict: > 12. You turn off your modem and get this awful empty feeling, like you just > pulled the plug on a loved one. > > /// Bram Moolenaar -- b...@moolenaar.net -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ > /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ > \\\ > \\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org > /// > \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// >
-- - Yasuhiro Matsumoto -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
