On Saturday, March 16, 2013 6:37:18 AM UTC+1, Kana Natsuno wrote: > Don't you have any idea about this problem?
On Saturday, March 16, 2013 12:06:50 PM UTC+1, glts wrote: > Here are the contents of the redo buffer when ... The "repeat.vim" plugin was created to solve this problem but it doesn't work for omaps neither. I don't know if you saw it but there is some discussion here: https://github.com/tpope/vim-repeat/issues/8 In my opinion, the redo buffer should be the same in both of your examples, namely "d:call Select()\n". But since there is only one redo buffer and you can call functions/:normal recursively, there's always the chance of it being overwritten. Folks, would it make sense to add another "top-level" redo buffer? This would be left untouched by nested :normal commands. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
