On Mon, March 18, 2013 23:23, OmnipotentEntity wrote: > > Anyway, testing out with the set cuc and set nocuc specified yields > different behavior from with those 3 lines commented out. (Aside from the > obvious difference in column highlighting. > > This behavior is also reproducible using "set cul", "set nocuc", and "set > nocul".
I already wrote, what is causing this. Didn't you get that message? The problem is, that certain options set curwin->w_set_curswant (and this is consistent with other vi clones), so I wouldn't call this a bug here. regards, Christian -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
