I still don't think it should be an error. Sometimes when you start typing "d3..." you realize you wanted "change" instead of "delete", so you press <Esc> and start again.
For me, "d:call <Esc>" is the same thing. Perhaps you want to use a custom function but you forgot to source the relevant file, so you cancel and start again. I don't feel this is an error. What do you think? On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Christian Brabandt <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, March 27, 2013 17:18, glts wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Christian Brabandt <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> On Mi, 27 Mär 2013, glts wrote: >>>> d:call<Esc> >>>> >>>> This command has no effect. >>> >>> But it doesn't really abort. >> >> I don't understand. The command is cancelled silently, just as it is >> when you cancel other Operator-pending commands, e.g. "d3<Esc>". This is >> what I would expect. > > Not it isn't. Simple case: > :h > d:call<esc> > > (Note the error message). Oh right, I didn't catch that. All the more reason to sort out the root cause. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
