I agree with you. > > So :python is specified python2 or python3 if it possible. And if both are > > enabled, I prefer it's python3.
I feel it is too aggressive for right now. I prefer :python means oldest python always and just wait python2 disabled on most platforms. 2013年4月4日木曜日 18時37分06秒 UTC+9 Paul Moore: > On Tuesday, 2 April 2013 12:28:40 UTC+1, mattn wrote: > > I prefer rename python in current to python2, And define aliased command > > 'python'. > > And I think that command must not be modifiable for users. > > So :python is specified python2 or python3 if it possible. And if both are > > enabled, I prefer it's python3. > > I agree. Python 3 is becoming more common, so at some point having "python" > mean "Python 2" will become obsolete. It requires some work to write Python > code that is portable between Python 2 and 3, but it is certainly possible > (and indeed it is the recommended approach to writing Python code that is > portable between 2 and 3 these days). > > Very definitely, having :python mean "whichever of Python 2 or 3 is compiled > in" makes sense. > > Paul. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
