> Hi! The following example contains a valid C99 (and C11) compound literal:
>
> post(
> letter,
> &(struct envelope){
> .stamp = {
> .value = ONE_CENT,
> .pic = RAT
> },
> .address = &address
> }
> );
>
> Yet even after setting "let c_no_curly_error = 1", the last closing
> parenthesis remains highlighted in red as if it were an error.
>
> However, if I remove the ".stamp = { ... }" struct member, the
> highlight disappears, so it seems to me that c_no_curly_error can only
> ignore un-nested pairs of braces within any given pair of parentheses.
>
> Can this be fixed and/or is there a workaround? I wouldn't mind
> disabling parentheses-related error checking all together, should that
> be what it takes.
Sending this to vim-dev since I got no reply on the vim user list, and
because I guess it's fair to call the above a bug (vim 7.3.875).
I considered sending a patch of syntax/c.vim, but given that file's
complexity, chances are I'd end up breaking something without even
noticing. Would be happy if a dev could take a look.
Thanks,
Will
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
