On Wednesday, June 12, 2013 12:13:48 AM UTC-5, Ben Fritz wrote: > Isn't that first bit much too complicated? Am I missing something, or is this: > > \%(\%(\.\@<!\.\)\@<!\|::\)\_s*\zs\%(RUBY_... > > equivalent to this: > > \%([^.]\.\_s*\)\@<!\%(RUBY_... > > ? >
Well, it's not quite equivalent. For example the existing pattern will match: abc. RUBY_VERSION and fail to match: abc.RUBY_VERSION The new pattern fails to match both. I've never even looked at Ruby before, I have no idea whether which behavior is intended. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
