Pokey Rule wrote: > I run vim with no file on the command-line, so that it shows the > scratch buffer. When I then run > > :e foo > > to edit file 'foo', there is a BufUnload event triggered for file > 'foo'. Here is a test vim command that I use to demonstrate the issue: > > autocmd BufUnload * echom "Unloaded " . expand("<afile>") > > I posted this issue to stackoverflow, where user Ingo Karkat responded: > > I can reproduce this with the latest Vim 7.4a.39. I guess this has to > do with the fact that Vim reuses the initial scratch buffer number (1) > for the first :edited file. Please report this problem to the vim_dev > mailing list.
Thanks, I'll add a note to the todo list. -- hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict: 8. You spend half of the plane trip with your laptop on your lap...and your child in the overhead compartment. /// Bram Moolenaar -- b...@moolenaar.net -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.