I can confirm that Patch 2 fixes this! Thanks so much! Seriously!

On Wednesday, August 21, 2013 11:45:52 AM UTC-7, Amadeus Demarzi wrote:
> Just curious if any headway has been made on this lookbehind regex issue?
> 
> I only ask because it breaks a pretty popular JS syntax plugin.
> 
> On Tuesday, August 13, 2013 5:34:52 PM UTC-7, Amadeus Demarzi wrote:
> > Alright, so I am admittedly terrible with Regexes, but I think I did find 
> > something.
> > 
> > Using this file for the regex test:
> > 
> > https://gist.github.com/amadeus/82d0288a9b8b2e3ff2a9
> > 
> > And using this regex in search, with hlsearch on:
> > 
> > \(\(\(return\|case\)\s\+\)\@<=\|\(\([)\]"']\|\d\|\w\)\s*\)\@<!\)\/
> > 
> > Both engines 1 and 2 highlight the / right after `case` and `return`. Only 
> > engine 1 highlights the / on line 1 though.
> > 
> > On Tuesday, August 13, 2013 12:56:21 PM UTC-7, Amadeus Demarzi wrote:
> > > I am pretty bad with regex stuff, but I will try to figure out how to 
> > > isolate it.
> > > 
> > > I posted it here quickly just in case there was something silly I was 
> > > missing in that snippet. 
> > > 
> > > For what it's worth, it's used in this syntax plugin:
> > > 
> > > http://github.com/pangloss/vim-javascript
> > > 
> > > And setting the regexpengine=1 | syntax enable fixes the problem, 
> > > although it's a far from ideal solution.
> > > 
> > > On Tuesday, August 13, 2013 11:09:49 AM UTC-7, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> > > > Amadeus Demarzi wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > With the update to vim 7.4, it seems as if this particular regex just
> > > > 
> > > > > doesn't match in particular cases in 7.4, but it worked fine in 7.3.
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > syntax region  jsRegexpString    
> > > > > start=+\(\(\(return\|case\)\s\+\)\@<=\|\(\([)\]"']\|\d\|\w\)\s*\)\@<!\)/\(\*\|/\)\@!+
> > > > >  skip=+\\\\\|\\/+ end=+/[gimy]\{,4}+ 
> > > > > contains=jsSpecial,jsRegexpCharClass,jsRegexpGroup,@jsRegexpSpecial,@htmlPreproc
> > > > >  oneline
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > Does not match in 7.4, but did in 7.3:
> > > > 
> > > > > var x = /test/;
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > Matches in 7.4 and 7.3:
> > > > 
> > > > > return /test/;
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > I am posting in here in case there is a simple quickfix that I am
> > > > 
> > > > > overlooking. Otherwise I can attempt to put together a more
> > > > 
> > > > > reproducible test case.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > I'll see if I can reproduce it.  Please try to come up with a simple
> > > > 
> > > > search pattern that fails.  You can use 'regexpengine' to select the old
> > > > 
> > > > code.  A syntax command makes it difficult to pinpoint the problem.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > -- 
> > > > 
> > > > From "know your smileys":
> > > > 
> > > >  ~#:-(  I just washed my hair, and I can't do nuthin' with it.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >  /// Bram Moolenaar -- b...@moolenaar.net -- http://www.Moolenaar.net   
> > > > \\\
> > > > 
> > > > ///        sponsor Vim, vote for features -- 
> > > > http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
> > > > 
> > > > \\\  an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org       
> > > >  ///
> > > > 
> > > >  \\\            help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org    
> > > > ///

-- 
-- 
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Raspunde prin e-mail lui