Geoff Greer wrote: > Thanks for taking time to look at our patch and give feedback. Besides > pausing/resuming timers, are there any other blockers for merging this > patch? Matt and I really want to get it merged, but there's been a > recurring pattern where we address one thing only to have another > brought up. > > If this is the last thing, we'll gladly add it. If it's not the last > thing, please give us a complete list of blockers. Then we can > determine if we want to continue addressing your issues or just > maintain our own fork of Vim.
I don't have time to look at it now. Did you remove the 'ticktime' option already? I would also prefer to see the word "timer" in related functions. I think the last patch still used "timeout". It's better to postpone including this patch until we settle down on how it works. I have had bad experiences with including a feature before it's fully working or insufficiently tested. -- When I look deep into your eyes, I see JPEG artifacts. I can tell by the pixels that we're wrong for each other. (xkcd) /// Bram Moolenaar -- b...@moolenaar.net -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
