Hi Bram, Christian and Vimmers,
I received a bug report from Taro Muraoka.
This bug occurd in 7.4.085 or later.
--------
How to reproduce.
1. Open new buffer and input below and cursor on the '2'.
123
4567
2. Input <C-v>j$Aab<Esc>
--------
Actual behavior
- "23" in the second line is strange obviously.
123ab
45623ab7
--------
Expected behavior
- I don't know :-)
But I think that may be to bypass the process that was added in 7.4.085 when
used '$' in visual mode.
I wrote a patch.
Please check.
Best regards,
Hirohito Higashi
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
diff -r 58bcf8fa172f src/ops.c
--- a/src/ops.c Sun Nov 17 20:32:54 2013 +0100
+++ b/src/ops.c Tue Nov 19 02:45:50 2013 +0900
@@ -2556,9 +2556,12 @@
char_u *firstline, *ins_text;
struct block_def bd;
int i;
+ int doller_used;
/* edit() changes this - record it for OP_APPEND */
bd.is_MAX = (curwin->w_curswant == MAXCOL);
+ /* used '$' to select the Visual mode */
+ doller_used = (curwin->w_curswant == MAXCOL);
/* vis block is still marked. Get rid of it now. */
curwin->w_cursor.lnum = oap->start.lnum;
@@ -2637,7 +2640,7 @@
if (curwin->w_cursor.lnum != oap->start.lnum || got_int)
return;
- if (oap->block_mode)
+ if (oap->block_mode && !doller_used)
{
struct block_def bd2;
