Obviously I am not a developer on this project, but as a lurker/avid vim user, I can definitely say I would love to see something like this get incorporated into the mainline vim.
On Friday, December 6, 2013 3:00:47 AM UTC-8, Thiago Arruda wrote: > My last post(https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/vim_dev/lylNU4Na2Nk) gave > me the impression that the lack of multithreading/message queue/event loop > was a > problem to be solved in vim, and I this patch has a potential solution that > has > little impact on the current code. > > Any chance a dev(Bram, Ben Fritz, ZyX..) could comment? Heres the feedback I > was > hoping for: > > - Was I not clear about something? > - Are my assumptions valid? If not, what did I miss? > - Theres any chance I could get help? As stated in the main post, I had a few > troubles which I believe could be easily solved with the help of a developer > with more experience in hacking the code > - Is there any hope something like this will ever be merged? This is the most > important feedback because it will give me a clue on whether I should > continue > to work on the patch. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
