Lcd wrote:

> > >     Scenario:
> > > 
> > > (1) set a loclist:
> > > 
> > >         call setloclist(0, list)
> > > 
> > > (2) at some point later replace the list:
> > > 
> > >         call setloclist(0, other_list, 'r')
> > > 
> > > (3) open the quickfix window
> > > 
> > >         lopen
> > > 
> > > (4) switch to the quickfix window and press Enter to jump to an error:
> > > 
> > >         .ll
> > > 
> > >     The result is a read from free'd memory; valgrind trace included
> > > below.  It's easy to make Vim crash from there, but the stack trace
> > > doesn't reveal any additional information.
> > >
> > >     Sadly, this is not consistently reproducible.  I can trigger it
> > > in syntastic, but I can't seem to get the same result in a simple
> > > test file.
> >
> > I have sent out patch 7.4.379.  Can you check that this fixes the
> > problem?
> 
>     That was something I tried too, but it doesn't work; new valgrind
> trace included below.

What exactly are the arguments to ex_cc when this happens?  Without
knowing that the number of possibilities is too big.

Can you reproduce it with a fixed location list?  Otherwise I can't
reproduce the problem.

>     However, try as I might I can't reproduce the problem in a simpler
> setup, and that suggests the bug might be completely unrelated to
> setloclist().  The closest approximation of a rational explanation that
> I have so far is a scenario I accidentally run into yesterday, involving
> calling a void function in a non-void context.  E.g.:
> 
>         function! s:foo()
>             let var = 1
>         endfunction
> 
>         if s:foo()
>             " do something
>         endif
> 
>     That happened because I deleted the return statement in s:foo()
> while refactoring it.  To my surprise Vim didn't complain.  My script
> jumped at some ranmdom place, but otherwise happily went on.  I'm not
> familiar enough with the code to attempt a fix to that.

A function without a return statement should return the number zero.
As far as I can see that is what happens in your example.

-- 
OLD WOMAN: King of the WHO?
ARTHUR:    The Britons.
OLD WOMAN: Who are the Britons?
                 "Monty Python and the Holy Grail" PYTHON (MONTY) PICTURES LTD

 /// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net   \\\
///        sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\  an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org        ///
 \\\            help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org    ///

-- 
-- 
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Raspunde prin e-mail lui