Marcin Szamotulski wrote: > I was wondering for some time why the :buffer command does not allow for > +cmd argument (:help +cmd), like :edit does. Though this is not > strictly necessary since one can always do > :buffer1|cmd > but the same is true for :edit command; one can do both: > :edit +cmd file > :edit file|cmd > > I attach a patch as a proof of concept and to let it try.
I suppose we would make this consistent, also do this for ":sbuf", ":bnext", etc. -- He who laughs last, thinks slowest. /// Bram Moolenaar -- b...@moolenaar.net -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.