On Do, 21 Aug 2014, 'Andy Wokula' via vim_dev wrote:
> Am 21.08.2014 um 07:49 schrieb Christian Brabandt:
> >Am 2014-08-20 19:03, schrieb 'Andy Wokula' via vim_dev:
> >>Some people expect :1,$bd or :%bd to delete all buffers.
> >
> >That only works by accident, because your current buffer has more
> >lines than you have open buffers.
> >
> >Or saying it differently, this does not work in an empty buffer.
> >
> >So this expectation is not really valid.
>
> Er, what you cited implies that it doesn't work at the moment
> (as expected (by some people (for a long time))).
>
> The idea is to make it become valid ...
>
> >Marcin Szamotulski wrote:
> >>There are probably a few other commands that could benefit with a
> >>similar approach.
>
> Got it?
>
Ah, I thought you wanted to keep the current behaviour, that currently
%bd already does delete all buffers (but only, if your buffer has enough
lines).
Best,
Christian
--
Richtiges Auffassen einer Sache und Mißverstehen der gleichen Sache
schließen einander nicht aus.
-- Franz Kafka
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
