Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Charles Campbell wrote:
I find reading the folded lines to be less than ideal, as the extra
spacing required of the "+---"s varies and so lines: doesn't line up.
This patch makes all the +---... prefixes take up 5 spaces (using %-5s,
so it uses padding). By itself, this makes the folded sections, no
matter how deep, also line up; the patch now pads the beginning of the
folding titles with spaces indicating folding depth (and retaining the
+---- marking).
I find the result to be more quickly legible.
It does look nicer. The 5 spaces is an arbitrary number, perhaps that
should be an option? Or perhaps we can use 'numberwidth'?
I see that numberwidth defaults to 4 and its a minimum width. Perhaps I
should use numberwidth and similarly use the qty of lines in the buffer
(ie. use the number_width() fun ction). I think that re-use of
numberwidth would be ok. I'll submit another patch soon (I've written
it, but I'm still testing it).
Regards,
Chip
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
