On 2014-12-08 Monday at 20:07 -0800 mattn wrote: > On Friday, December 5, 2014 10:37:34 PM UTC+9, Roland Eggner wrote: > > Priorities, when “Search”, “CursorLine” and “cterm(fg|bg)” overlap: > > > > │ previously │ with your patch │ IMO even better would be > > ───────────────┼────────────┼─────────────────┼───────────────────────── > > “Search” │ 1 │ 2 │ 1 > > “CursorLine” │ - │ 1 │ 2 > > “cterm(fg|bg)” │ - │ 3 │ 3 > > > > Would you like “Search” having higher priority than “CursorLine”? > > My patch is already your's better. > > http://go-gyazo.appspot.com/609a652dc6026cd5.png > > :set cursorline hlsearch > /Enter
Yes, with gvim and your hl-configuration looks as desired. In the meantime I looked at hl_combine_attr() and noted, it performs a kind of merge rather than just applying priorities. Thus my table quoted above is not really appropriate. I am using vim in terminals with 8 and 256 colors. For best result with your patch applied my colorscheme needs a bit tweaking, so no problem. Thank you for your contribution. -- Roland Eggner -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
pgpB0NjAEjazp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
