Hi Bram!
On Di, 20 Jan 2015, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> Thinking about this again: It should be OK to store the column and the
> computed virtual column. These do not depend on the RE state. When
> trying several states at the same position the virtual column will be
> computed only once. And when the column is higher than the cached
> column, we know the virtual column is also higher than the cached
> virtual column. That should help avoid useless calls to
> win_linetabsize() while still being accurate, instead of the wild guess
> using 'tabsize'.
We would also need this for the old engine, don't we?
>
> Christian, do you think you could work on this? And write a test.
I'd like to, but I do not understand the NFA engine good enough to do
this.
Best,
Christian
--
Tausch nicht das Leben gegen den Traum. Besiegen kann man nur die
Wirklichkeit.
-- Lucius Annaeus Seneca (4-65 n.Chr.)
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
