On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Mikołaj Machowski <mikm...@wp.pl> wrote: > Dnia Niedziela, 30 Sierpnia 2015 18:35 Bram Moolenaar <b...@moolenaar.net> > napisał(a) >> So far the keepempty argument was zero or non-zero. If we make it a >> string then we can pass different flags: >> 0 default - drop empty items at start and end >> 1 keep all empty items >> 'd' drop all empty items >> 's' drop one empty item at start >> 'e' drop one empty item at end >> 'se' drop one empty item at start and end >> >> How about that? > > Definitely yes for expansion of keepempty argument but have one doubt - > wouldn't 's' and 'e' behaviour as: > > drop ALL empty items at start/end > > make more sense? For myself I cannot see advantages to drop only one of them.
Or even: 's' drop one empty item at start 'S' drop all empty items at start (same for 'e' and 'E') Christ van Willegen -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
