Christian Brabandt wrote: > That is true with many patches however. It works only well, if > contributors do use it. And a lot of syntax files need to be > maintained, if only because the language evolves within times. Best, > Christian Also because suggested syntax changes are occasionally ill-advised. I just got a suggestion, for example, that would have obliterated Bourne shell syntax handling by conflating it with posix shell syntax. And there've been innumerable attempts to get a LaTeX package supported by syntax/tex.vim (my position on that: its impractical to maintain syntax/latex.vim with it supporting tens, hundreds, or thousands of LaTex packages; instead, the best way is to set up small after/syntax/tex/pkgname.tex files and publish them).
Regards, Chip Campbell -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
