Luc Hermitte wrote: > I'm not sure whether sort() can be applied with 'n' parameter on lists of > strings that encode numbers. > > Right now (v7.4-908) the result produced is: ['1', '5', '48', '25', '5', > '28', '6'] which is really odd. > > Is this a vim bug, or an undefined behaviour?
As mentioned, this works as intended. However, it's not useful. I think we should add the "N" parameter, which sorts numeric strings. Without that it's not so easy. -- I'm so disorganized my keyboard isn't even in alphabetical order! /// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
