Christian Brabandt wrote:

> Bram,
> this patch fies an issue reported by David Fishburn about a misbehaving 
> searchpairpos(). I traced it back to syntax.c and I think what happens 
> is, that Vim gets confused about the current syntax stack. I added a 
> newstyle test, that lets the problem reproduce, given the plugin from 
> David. I hope it is okay, to include some plugins for the tests.
> 
> I have fixed that behaviour for David back in October and haven't heard 
> from him back since then. I think, this patch should be included for a 
> possible vim 7.5.
> CC'ing David for his opinion.

I can't find a note about the original problem, what was it?

Including a whole plugin to test with is not a good idea.
Knowing what you fixed, I'm sure you can come up with a much simpler
test.

-- 
FIRST SOLDIER:  So they wouldn't be able to bring a coconut back anyway.
SECOND SOLDIER: Wait a minute! Suppose two swallows carried it together?
FIRST SOLDIER:  No, they'd have to have it on a line.
                 "Monty Python and the Holy Grail" PYTHON (MONTY) PICTURES LTD

 /// Bram Moolenaar -- b...@moolenaar.net -- http://www.Moolenaar.net   \\\
///        sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\  an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org        ///
 \\\            help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org    ///

-- 
-- 
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to