(I presume you're namsh.) I made sure that, for both gtk2vim and gtk3vim, the numbers of calls of the function are the same, which implies we can safely assume that the function is not a bottleneck. A useful info.
Thank you! Kazunobu 2016-03-16 8:51 GMT+09:00 goweol <vim-dev-git...@256bit.org>: > Hello, > > Here is a full profile. > > Thanks, > > anal-gtk2.txt.gz > <https://github.com/vim/vim/files/175049/anal-gtk2.txt.gz> > anal-gtk3.txt.gz > <https://github.com/vim/vim/files/175048/anal-gtk3.txt.gz> > > — > You are receiving this because you commented. > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/vim/vim/issues/681#issuecomment-197071734> > > -- > -- > You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. > Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. > For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "vim_dev" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
