> OK, yes, in that case it is different from a real empty list.
> Do we really case about that?
Anyway, the fix is simple:
--- a/eval.c
+++ b/eval.c
@@ -10096,9 +10096,10 @@ static void f_getreg(typval_T *argvars, typval_T
*rettv)
rettv->v_type = VAR_LIST;
rettv->vval.v_list =
get_reg_contents(regname, (arg2 ? kGRegExprSrc : 0) | kGRegList);
- if (rettv->vval.v_list != NULL) {
- rettv->vval.v_list->lv_refcount++;
+ if (rettv->vval.v_list == NULL) {
+ rettv->vval.v_list = list_alloc();
}
+ rettv->vval.v_list->lv_refcount++;
} else {
(well, patch from neovim, but vim is the same except indention and brackets)
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
