Christian Brabandt wrote:
> > Have you tried after patch 7.4.1939? It fixes a problem where
> > w_jumplistlen was overwritten with a line number. Valgrind doesn't
> > catch this because it's still within a struct.
>
> I saw that patch, and it looks suspicious, but it was in a different
> section of the file. It still fails after 7.4.1940
You mentioned w_jumplistlen went negative. I can't find any place where
w_jumplistlen might be set to a negative value. And I don't think it
could happen by writing at w_jumplist[JUMPLISTSIZE] since we don't use
negative line numbers.
Could it possibly be a compiler optimizer bug?
--
hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict:
94. Now admit it... How many of you have made "modem noises" into
the phone just to see if it was possible? :-)
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
