James McCoy wrote: > On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 10:32:52PM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > > The neovim implementation is similar, but not better. > > It skips adding spaces where needed. > > What do you mean by "adding spaces where needed"? Why would a function > that's just supposed to capture the display of a command add anything to > it?
It's not just adding spaces, it's incrementing the column. Some commands will get stuck trying to advance to a certain column. This was a bug for :redir that got fixed at some point. Anyway, any difference with the output of :redir makes it inconsistent. See no reason for that. There will be spaces anyway. -- hundred-and-one symptoms of being an internet addict: 229. You spend so much time thinking what to add on this list. /// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
