On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 2:08 AM, Matěj Cepl <mc...@cepl.eu> wrote: > On 2016-10-26, 22:23 GMT, Tony Mechelynck wrote: >> Don't make the too frequent error to believe that everyone >> else, or at least most of them, has the same preferences as >> you. The fact that we hardly ever see a post about whether or >> not vimballs are the way to go does not necessarily mean that >> everyone dislikes them the way you do. On the contrary, >> I would intrpret that silence as meaning that the current >> state of affairs is OK for most people, because if it weren't >> they would complain. I hardly ever see such a complaint, yours >> is a "once in a blue moon" thing. > > I don’t think this is the case. I have been following a lot of > vim-related news and communications in the last year or more, > and I have found a lot of plugins which are just uploaded to > vim.org/scripts/ (mostly tarballs or zip archives), and a lot of > plugins which are in a git repo (99.9% cases in GitHub). This is > the first vimball I see in a long long time.
Ohhh, so that's what you mean. Well, here is another try: Not being imitated, or not being a copycat himself, don't necessarily mean that Dr. Chip is wrong, especially with Vim, which prides himself about allowing the users to obtain the same results by different means. Regards, Tony. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
