On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 11:02:34PM +0100, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> 
> Michal Grochmal wrote:
> 
> > I may be doing a horrible misinterpretation of the subject, but here goes
> > nothing.
> > 
> > > > > > This just uses the existing logic in mch_can_exe to populate a 
> > > > > > buffer with the
> > > > > > absolute path to the binary.  The Windows code was already walking
> > > > > > $PATH, so it seems pointless not to actually use the information.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Quite a few years ago I was debugging a Vim that started up slowly.  
> > > > > It
> > > > > turned out that walking through $PATH was the main cause for that.  
> > > > > So I
> > > > > don't want to walk through $PATH when not really needed.
> > > > 
> > > > Then it would be better to use platform-specific functionality to get
> > > > the absolute path of the running binary instead of trying to re-use
> > > > functionality that's intended for a different purpose.
> > > 
> > > What platform-specific functionality is there?  Perhaps Linux has a way
> > > to get the actual path, instead of using argv[0]?
> > 
> > Standard unix (as in SUSv3) does not have any specified way to determine the
> > running binary.  It really is a thing of comparing argv[0] whilst walking
> > through PATH.  And it has more sheanigans that you may at first think: 
> > there's
> > the tilde (~) and all relative PATH.  Just look at the GNU which source to 
> > see
> > that madness:
> > http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/which/which/which.c?revision=1.41&view=markup
> > 
> > And then you can run `realpath(3)` to get the absolute path.
> > 
> > On the other hand, on *Linux* you can use `readlink(3)` on `/proc/self/exe` 
> > and
> > you get the absolute path of the running binary.  FreeBSD (and a handful of
> > other BSDs support the same interface too).
> > 
> > i.e.
> > 
> >     #include <limits.h>
> >     #include <unistd.h>
> > 
> >     char buf[PATH_MAX+1];
> >     ssize_t len;
> > 
> >     len = readlink("/proc/self/exe", buf, PATH_MAX);
> >     buf[len] = '\0'
> > 
> > Should *always* work on Linux.
> 
> Thanks, looks like that's what we need.

For what it's worth, I've started working on a PR to implement Windows,
Linux, and FreeBSD/macOS support.  The /proc trick only works on Linux,
since that's a Linux-specific filesystem (although some of the BSDs may
have an optional emulation layer).

Cheers,
-- 
James
GPG Key: 4096R/91BF BF4D 6956 BD5D F7B7  2D23 DFE6 91AE 331B A3DB

-- 
-- 
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Raspunde prin e-mail lui