Kazunobu Kuriyama wrote:
> Arguably, static gravities are only useful for applications such as image
> viewers where draw operations can be quite expensive and images displayed
> on them are rarely updated (or, even require no update).
>
> Meanwhile, any text editor usually draws its contents every time it is
> being resized because it needs to reflow the text and adjust the size and
> position of widgets, especially scrollbar thumbs, in the course of that.
>
> Hence, in general, there's no good reason to set static gravities for text
> editors.
>
> In addition, recent versions of GTK+ 2 no longer use
> gdk_window_set_static_gravities() for themselves, and as of 3.16, GTK+ 3
> has deprecated and reduced it to a stub only returning a constant boolean
> value.
>
> With those reasons and the attached patch, I propose to get rid of static
> gravity attribute for GTK+ GUIs.
Fine with me. Thanks!
--
"Intelligence has much less practical application than you'd think."
-- Scott Adams, Dilbert.
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
