* Tony Mechelynck <antoine.mechely...@gmail.com> [2018-07-05 11:39 +0200]:
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 11:30 AM, Elimar Riesebieter <riese...@lxtec.de> wrote: > > * Tony Mechelynck <antoine.mechely...@gmail.com> [2018-07-05 09:49 +0200]: > > > > [...] > > > >> Since there is no reason a user would modify the Make_all.mak, a link > >> is enough (like for most other sources) -- see attached patch. > > > > Shouldn't there be a slash at '..Make_all.mak .' ? > > Oops, yes, there should. I attach the revised patch. Proof of the > well-known fact that every patch should be checked by at least one > pair of eyes in addition to those of its author. Applying the patch and fire up a compilerun would be a good test... BTW, don't you have 'one pair of eyes'? Elimar -- Learned men are the cisterns of knowledge, not the fountainheads ;-) -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
