The version notes:
Huge version with X11-Motif GUI. Features included (+) or not (-):
+acl +farsi +mouse_sgr -tag_any_white
+arabic +file_in_path -mouse_sysmouse -tcl
+autocmd +find_in_path +mouse_urxvt +termguicolors
-autoservername +float +mouse_xterm +terminal
+balloon_eval +folding +multi_byte +terminfo
+balloon_eval_term -footer +multi_lang +termresponse
+browse +fork() -mzscheme +textobjects
++builtin_terms +gettext +netbeans_intg +timers
+byte_offset -hangul_input -num64 +title
+channel +iconv +packages +toolbar
+cindent +insert_expand +path_extra +user_commands
+clientserver +job -perl +vertsplit
+clipboard +jumplist +persistent_undo +virtualedit
+cmdline_compl +keymap +postscript +visual
+cmdline_hist +lambda +printer +visualextra
+cmdline_info +langmap +profile +viminfo
+comments +libcall -python +vreplace
+conceal +linebreak -python3 +wildignore
+cryptv +lispindent +quickfix +wildmenu
+cscope +listcmds +reltime +windows
+cursorbind +localmap +rightleft +writebackup
+cursorshape -lua -ruby +X11
+dialog_con_gui +menu +scrollbind +xfontset
+diff +mksession +signs +xim
+digraphs +modify_fname +smartindent +xpm
-dnd +mouse +startuptime +xsmp_interact
-ebcdic +mouseshape +statusline +xterm_clipboard
+emacs_tags +mouse_dec -sun_workshop -xterm_save
+eval -mouse_gpm +syntax
+ex_extra -mouse_jsbterm +tag_binary
+extra_search +mouse_netterm +tag_old_static
system vimrc file: "$VIM/vimrc"
user vimrc file: "$HOME/.vimrc"
2nd user vimrc file: "~/.vim/vimrc"
user exrc file: "$HOME/.exrc"
system gvimrc file: "$VIM/gvimrc"
user gvimrc file: "$HOME/.gvimrc"
2nd user gvimrc file: "~/.vim/gvimrc"
defaults file: "$VIMRUNTIME/defaults.vim"
system menu file: "$VIMRUNTIME/menu.vim"
fall-back for $VIM: "/home/harolds/share/vim"
Compilation: gcc -std=gnu99 -c -I. -Iproto -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DFEAT_GUI_MOTIF
-I/usr/dt/include -O2 -fno-strength-reduce -Wall -I/opt/x11r6/include
Linking: gcc -std=gnu99 -L/usr/dt/lib -R /usr/dt/lib -L/opt/x11r6/lib
-R/opt/x11r6/lib -o vim -lXmu -lXext -lXm -lXpm -lm -lncurses
uname: SunOS XXXX 5.8 Generic_Virtual sun4u sparc SUNW,SPARC-Enterprise
I first saw problems with a plugin but when debugging that I saw this problem
with a basic :let output (extract)
loaded_matchparen #0
NETRW_DIRHIST_CNT #0
NETRW_BOOKMARKMAX #0
b:changedtick #0
v:beval_winid #0
v:version #0
v:t_list #0
v:beval_winnr #0
v:errors []
v:lnum #0
v:hlsearch #0
v:t_channel #0
Every positive values showed a display value of 0, negative values showed a
display value of -1.
I traced from the ex_let() function to get_tv_string_buf_chk() where there is
these lines:
7143 case VAR_NUMBER:
1 vim_snprintf((char *)buf, NUMBUFLEN, "%lld",
2 (long
long)varp->vval.v_number);
This is fine, v_number is 32 bits and this just converts the number by sign
extension to a 64 bit number.
vim_snprintf() leads to new code in messages.c and a variable list is
generated. That passes on until vim_vsnprintf_typval()
Note that FEAT_NUM64 is not defined.
4469 /* parse 'h', 'l' and 'll' length modifiers */
1 if (*p == 'h' || *p == 'l')
2 {
3 length_modifier = *p;
4 p++;
5 if (length_modifier == 'l' && *p == 'l')
6 {
7 /* double l = long long */
8 # ifdef FEAT_NUM64
9 length_modifier = 'L';
10 # else
11 length_modifier = 'l'; /* treat it as a single
'l' */
12 # endif
13 p++;
14 }
15 }
So there is a variable list with the address of a long long value and a lld
format which is then is treated as a single long. Hence the display of the
extended sign as the number.
Hoping that this was the common source of the problem I removed FEAT_NUM64
checks. This solved the :let display problem.
However, the plugin executable() function problem was still there and CTRL-A
always returns a result of 0.
I tried building again with no changes but the FEAT_NUM64 feature forced on.
This led to even stranger results :let display displays 100 as the value for
all positive numbers and -4294967196 for all negative numbers. CTRL-A always
returns a result of 177.
The gcc compiler used is the same for my working 8.0 build. The 8.1 build used
options including -O2 but I also tried a build with the exact options as on the
8.0 build and it had the same problems. I also tried a build with a different
compiler and that produced the same results.
Interested if anyone has a working Solaris VIM 8.1 product with the extant code.
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
