Daniel Hahler wrote:
> While `:echo {}` works, `:echom {}` fails with `E731: using Dictionary as a
> String`.
>
> For prototyping and in general it would be nice if this would be
> consistent, i.e. `:echom {}` should work, and not require to use
> `:echom string({})`.
Yeah, it's because it uses the code for :execute. I suppose we can make
it work better. Same for :echoerr.
--
Know this story about a nerd who fell into a river and drowned,
despite his cries of "F1! F1!"?
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
