Hi Bram, On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 11:13 AM Bram Moolenaar <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yegappan wrote: > > > When a line with a sign is deleted, the sign is moved to the > > next line. If you undo the delete operation, the sign is not > > moved back to the original line. > > > > I expected that when a line with a sign is deleted, the sign > > will be removed. If you undo the delete the operation, the > > sign will be restored. This is how the named marks work. > > The current undo code handles the named marks correctly > > but doesn't handle signs. > > One of the uses of signs is displaying a breakpoint. When a line is > deleted, the breakpoint still exists. Displaying it on the next line > does seem like the best way to handle this. > > When undo-ing the delete ideally the sign is moved back to where it was. > But this is quite complicated, it would require the undo information to > contain data about the moved sign. I don't mind much about the sign > being displayed in the wrong line (the debugger with the executable is > already not in sync with the source code anyway). I do mind about the > sign not being displayed at all, it looks like the breakpoint was > removed, while it wasn't. >
It will be useful to add a note to sign.txt about this behavior. When a line with a sign is deleted, the sign is moved to the next line. Regards, Yegappan -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
