On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 8:35 PM Bram Moolenaar <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks, I updated https://www.vim.org/mercurial.php > We'll update it again when we get feedback about which one works best.
I'm not sure there's a single one which works *best*, i.e. definitely better than both others at the moment. AFAIK, all we know is that bitbucket is going to delete all Mercurial repositories in a little less than a year, so that server should not be relied upon in the long term. I've modified my .hg/hgrc as said earlier, and while there was nothing to pull, all three servers told me "no changes found" on the same clone. Then I set my default to the 256bit server, kept using it, and just now I pulled patch 8.1.1913 from it. Not the least problem. TL;DR: AFAIK all three work equally well for the time being, but we know that bitbucket support isn't going to stay. Best regards, Tony. -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_dev/CAJkCKXtHykHKRG5Y0e9_fj1E8Cuep4gMqvR%2BYsFBVhYnpXE1BA%40mail.gmail.com.
