Ken Takata wrote:
> 2020/1/3 Fri 19:02:13 UTC+9 Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> >
> >
> > Yasuhiro Matsumoto wrote:
> >
> > > Why you don't use { ?
> >
> > I know this will trigger a discussion. Nearly all languages use blocks
> > ending with "}". It's much easier to see where a block ends that way
> > than using "endif", "endwhile", etc., it stands out.
> >
> > Since we already have the start of the block without extra punctuation,
> > there is no need to add a "{" there. It would be pointless to add it.
> >
>
> Text objects like "a{" or "i{" don't work well without the starting "{".
That never worked for "for" / "endfor", right?
> Also "%" may not work well.
With some adjustments to b:match_words it works.
And when "%" works you can select a block from "if"/"while"/"for" until
the matching "}" with "v%".
--
TIM: That is not an ordinary rabbit ... 'tis the most foul cruel and
bad-tempered thing you ever set eyes on.
ROBIN: You tit. I soiled my armour I was so scared!
"Monty Python and the Holy Grail" PYTHON (MONTY) PICTURES LTD
/// Bram Moolenaar -- b...@moolenaar.net -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_dev/202001031317.003DHI64009156%40masaka.moolenaar.net.
