Paul Jolly wrote:
> > > I think the simplest thing for now is to follow Bram's suggestion of > > > using user_data. > > > > Hmm, would there be any harm in triggering CompleteDone before resetting > > the complete info? I don't think so. Would anyone using the > > autocommand event depend on the completion already being cleared? > > If yes, then we would need to introduce another event. I rather keep it > > simple and have just one event. > > I'm using this function for the first time so I'm not best placed to > comment. But my gut would say no, there should be no harm because you > can still use v:completed_item to determine whether you are > cancelling/accepting; but complete_info() would still give useful > information like mode. > > Prabir? Others? I suppose it's going to be hard to reach the people affected. Let me make the change and see if someone complains :-). -- Computers make very fast, very accurate, mistakes. /// Bram Moolenaar -- b...@moolenaar.net -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\ /// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\ \\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org /// \\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org /// -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_dev/202001171759.00HHxgRn032667%40masaka.moolenaar.net.
