Tony wrote:
> I suggest adding feature 'vim9' testable by has()
>
> This is for consistency, it is not absolutely necessary since ":if
> exists(':vim9script') == 2" should give the same result.
>
> I suppose the following is an oversight: In my current 8.2.279 builds,
> exists(':vim9script') returns 2 in the Huge build and 0 in the Big
> build, which might be expected.
I also get 2 in the big build.
> However exists(':vim9') returns 1 in
> both, which I don't explain. When typing :vim9 at the command-line
> followed by <Tab> there is no proposed completion AFAICT, not even in
> the Huge build. But :import, :export, :def, :enddef and :disassemble
> all return 2 in exists(), even in the Big build, and :disa<Tab> gets
> completed to :disassemble and vim9script is one of the proposed
> completions for :vi<Tab> (both even in Big).
--
>From "know your smileys":
+<(:-) The Pope
/// Bram Moolenaar -- [email protected] -- http://www.Moolenaar.net \\\
/// sponsor Vim, vote for features -- http://www.Vim.org/sponsor/ \\\
\\\ an exciting new programming language -- http://www.Zimbu.org ///
\\\ help me help AIDS victims -- http://ICCF-Holland.org ///
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/vim_dev/202002191646.01JGk0QO026298%40masaka.moolenaar.net.
